Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 2 authors, 2016-11-26
STALE3488d

[TEST PATCH] staging: speakup: speakup_acntpc.c Consider octal permissions

From: Walt Feasel <hidden>
Date: 2016-11-26 17:10:28

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 12:05:13PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:03:00PM -0500, Walt Feasel wrote:
quoted
Make suggested checkpatch modifications for
WARNING: Symbolic permissions 'S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO' are not preferred.
Consider using octal permissions '0644'.
WARNING: Symbolic permissions 'S_IRUGO' are not preferred.
Consider using octal permissions '0444'.

Signed-off-by: Walt Feasel <redacted>
---
I am new to making trivial patches and do not make some
for a few type of warnings.
This is one of them as I am not fully certain that it is
as easy as this.
The replacing of 'S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO' with '0644' seems
simple enough.
However the adding of '_RW' to '__ATTR' to make '__ATTR_RW'
I saw in a reply to a patch and am not sure that it would
be relevant in this case.
I also made a previous patch adding spaces around '|' and
want to know if just replacing 'S_IWUSR|S_IRUGO' with
'0644' in one shot would be acceptable since my being new
and not fixing just one type of warning per patch.
Seems straight forward but I have spammed other peoples
email and the mailing list enough with improper patches.

 drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_acntpc.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_acntpc.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_acntpc.c
index 27f812e..51281be 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_acntpc.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_acntpc.c
@@ -56,28 +56,28 @@ static struct var_t vars[] = {
 /* These attributes will appear in /sys/accessibility/speakup/acntpc. */
 
 static struct kobj_attribute caps_start_attribute =
-	__ATTR(caps_start, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, spk_var_show, spk_var_store);
+	__ATTR_RW(caps_start, 0644, spk_var_show, spk_var_store);
This breaks the build :(
I would assume from adding _RW as is didnt seem to be needed but
only a visual reference to the octal's permissions without
doing the math. I will look deeper into where __ATTR is
probally being called then. I'm not really worried with builds
yet till I have a better understanging of the issue as I would
expect all of them to fail at this point.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help