[TEST PATCH] staging: speakup: speakup_acntpc.c Consider octal permissions
From: Walt Feasel <hidden>
Date: 2016-11-26 17:10:28
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 12:05:13PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:03:00PM -0500, Walt Feasel wrote:quoted
Make suggested checkpatch modifications for WARNING: Symbolic permissions 'S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO' are not preferred. Consider using octal permissions '0644'. WARNING: Symbolic permissions 'S_IRUGO' are not preferred. Consider using octal permissions '0444'. Signed-off-by: Walt Feasel <redacted> --- I am new to making trivial patches and do not make some for a few type of warnings. This is one of them as I am not fully certain that it is as easy as this. The replacing of 'S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO' with '0644' seems simple enough. However the adding of '_RW' to '__ATTR' to make '__ATTR_RW' I saw in a reply to a patch and am not sure that it would be relevant in this case. I also made a previous patch adding spaces around '|' and want to know if just replacing 'S_IWUSR|S_IRUGO' with '0644' in one shot would be acceptable since my being new and not fixing just one type of warning per patch. Seems straight forward but I have spammed other peoples email and the mailing list enough with improper patches. drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_acntpc.c | 26 +++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_acntpc.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_acntpc.c index 27f812e..51281be 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_acntpc.c +++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_acntpc.c@@ -56,28 +56,28 @@ static struct var_t vars[] = { /* These attributes will appear in /sys/accessibility/speakup/acntpc. */ static struct kobj_attribute caps_start_attribute = - __ATTR(caps_start, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, spk_var_show, spk_var_store); + __ATTR_RW(caps_start, 0644, spk_var_show, spk_var_store);This breaks the build :(
I would assume from adding _RW as is didnt seem to be needed but only a visual reference to the octal's permissions without doing the math. I will look deeper into where __ATTR is probally being called then. I'm not really worried with builds yet till I have a better understanging of the issue as I would expect all of them to fail at this point.