Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2016-08-18

A very stupid question about formatting a patch :)

From: Greg KH <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-18 10:23:42

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 01:08:43PM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
quoted
I don't see anyone removing that line, perhaps you aren't looking at
the patch properly in an email client?

Leave it in there, it's good to have.
There is way too much traffic in LMKL for me to read it with e-mail
client. This is why I'm using lkml.org. Here are just a few random
patches that were sent today:

* https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/18/160
* https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/18/155
* https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/18/131
* https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/18/123
* https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/18/120
* https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/18/98

No empty lines. Maybe in fact there are empty lines but lkml.org
removed them? 
Yup, it looks that way, the above patches all have that line in them
when I look at the real emails.

I recommend using a real email client when dealing with patches, allmost
all web interfaces will mess them up.

greg k-h
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help