Since I knew that Linux kernel didn't accept the pax/grsecurity , but wrote
its own implement, and some linux developers do not have sense of security,
I think linux security will be a problem in the future.
    - mudongliang

2015-08-18 21:45 GMT+08:00 Kenneth Adam Miller [off-list ref]
:

Why? That's what the vast majority of the kernel is written in (besides
assembler, but what I'm looking for isn't a way to write safe assembler).
Plus, tons of people in the kernel development community *must* have some
concern or interest in security. I don't care if the kernel is written in
C, but I sure would like my kernel module to be safer. If I can get it I
don't care what language it's in-it just has to work and *be secure*.

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Robert P. J. Day [off-list ref]
wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, Kenneth Adam Miller wrote:

quoted

Ok- so I know that C is the defacto standard for kernel
development...

  and that's probably where you should have stopped typing. :-)

rday

--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20150818/c7de9dc7/attachment.html