Initial git repository - kernel tree
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <hidden>
Date: 2013-05-13 08:11:54
Hi Kevin, El Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:51:33AM +0300 Kevin Wilson ha dit:
I have a question about git patches.
When I run
git log include/linux/skbuff.h
and page down till the end, I reach
1da177e Linux-2.6.12-rc2
(I do it on the net-next tree.)
git show 1da177e gives:
Author: Linus Torvalds [off-list ref]
Date: Sat Apr 16 15:20:36 2005 -0700
Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
So this is the initial patch from 2005.
Now, does it mean that prior to this patch all patches
were not handled by git ? or was there some merging
from an old tree to a new tree where history of git
patches was removed in the new tree ?the first, before git was introduced the patches were handled by a proprietary VCS called bitkeeper. git was specifically written as a replacement for bitkeeper. see the following article for more details: http://news.cnet.com/Torvalds-unveils-new-Linux-control-system/2100-7344_3-5678651.html -- Matthias Kaehlcke Embedded Linux Developer Amsterdam Genius is one percent inspiration, ninety nine percent perspiration (Thomas Edison) .''`. using free software / Debian GNU/Linux | http://debian.org : :' : `. `'` gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 47D8E5D4 `-