Why "lsusb" return nothing?
From: Peter Teoh <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-03 23:33:48
THank you for your help. This is the result: mount -t usbdevfs none /proc/bus/usb mount: mount point /proc/bus/usb does not exist mkdir /proc/bus/usb mkdir: cannot create directory `/proc/bus/usb': No such file or directory And supposed I tried a directory that exist: mount -t usbdevfs none /proc/bus mount: unknown filesystem type 'usbdevfs' The exact mirror (before the problem start I mirrored the system) is still working today, and I have not find any difference between the two version so far. On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:51 PM, [off-list ref] wrote:
This steps helped me when I had same problem in SUSE9.
The Reason is "/proc/bus/usb/ doesn't has any entry where actually lsusb
searches to show USB BUS devices.To make that happen you have to manually .
Mount the Bus devices using below command.
mount -t usbdevfs none /proc/bus/usb/
And you are done.
Now lsusb should show all USB BUS devies.
Thanks
Ashish Bunkar
-----Original Message-----
From: kernelnewbies-bounces at kernelnewbies.org [mailto:
kernelnewbies-bounces at kernelnewbies.org] On Behalf Of Peter Teoh
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 7:12 AM
To: kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Why "lsusb" return nothing?
I entered "lsusb" at the command line (as root) and nothing is return, not
even any error message.
Doing a strace the last few lines are:
open("/dev/bus/usb", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1
ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/proc/bus/usb",
O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
What happened?
This is Ubuntu 10.04 (it used NOT to be like that, not sure I what did
wrong last time). But running a VirtualBox INSIDE this same OS, I
was able to get result from "lsusb" (after enabling the USB devices in
VirtualBox interface) and strace gives result:
open("/dev/bus/usb/001/002", O_RDWR) = 3
ioctl(3, USBDEVFS_IOCTL, 0xbff6f75c) = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate
ioctl for device)
close(3) = 0
open("/dev/bus/usb/001/001", O_RDWR) = 3
Why the difference?
--
Regards,
Peter Teoh
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies-- Regards, Peter Teoh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20121004/5523aba5/attachment.html