Why can not processes switch in atomic context?

Why can not processes switch in atomic context? · Parmenides <hidden> · 2012-07-03
Why can not processes switch in atomic context? · Subramaniam Appadodharana <hidden> · 2012-07-03
Why can not processes switch in atomic context? · Rajesh S R <hidden> · 2012-07-03
Why can not processes switch in atomic context? · anish kumar <hidden> · 2012-07-03
Why can not processes switch in atomic context? · Javier Martinez Canillas <hidden> · 2012-07-04
Why can not processes switch in atomic context? · anish singh <hidden> · 2012-07-04
Why can not processes switch in atomic context? · Javier Martinez Canillas <hidden> · 2012-07-04
Why can not processes switch in atomic context? · 弋天卜 <hidden> · 2012-07-04
Why can not processes switch in atomic context? · Dave Hylands <hidden> · 2012-07-04
Why can not processes switch in atomic context? · 卜弋天 <hidden> · 2012-07-04
Why can not processes switch in atomic context? · 卜弋天 <hidden> · 2012-07-05
Why can not processes switch in atomic context? · Parmenides <hidden> · 2012-07-05

From: Parmenides <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-05 02:38:29

Thanks for all responses to my question. As far as this quesiton be
concerned, I am more interested in why we should do somthing rather
than merely we should do it. The discussions have made it more and
more clear. Thanks again.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help