correct CONFIG_HZ option
From: solmac john <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-28 11:21:19
Thanks for reply what is CONFIG_NO_HZ can we enable CONFIG_NO_HZ and CONFIG_HZ both in our config and what the drawback of dynamic CONFIG_NO_HZ tick. On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Mulyadi Santosa <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi... :) On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:10 PM, solmac john [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
I am using ARM multicore board and by defaultokay, I am answering it from what I know about HZ impact on x86...quoted
CONFIG_HZ=250looks good... a middle safe number, not too high not too low...quoted
Query: - 1- How to decide HZ for particular hardwareit's you who decide...do you want finer grained timer? or coarse one? the impact is usually toward latency and responsiveness....together with preemption model you choose actually.quoted
2- Which is the best open source tool to test system performance from given HZ.run your application in that platform and see if it gives you impact. from my experience, unless you need application that is sensitive in timing such as MIDI sequencer, you won't notice the difference. -- regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consultant blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20120628/8bf9c3ad/attachment.html