the cost of vmalloc
From: Zheng Da <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-10 15:15:02
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Michael Blizek [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I need to allocate fairly a large piece of memory, about 128KB or 256KB. I tried to use kmalloc, and it sometimes fails, but vmalloc in this case usually still work. But I'm not sure how costly vmalloc is. As far as I know, vmalloc needs to change the page table, and thus might need to invalidate TLB. It seems quite expensive. If it is, maybe I can allocate memory with kmalloc first, and then try to use vmalloc if kmalloc fails. Any suggestions?If it is at all possible, I would suggest avoiding to allocate more than PAGE_SIZE (usually 4KB) in one continuous chunk. You can use e.g. scatterlists (which are basically lists of pointers) if you need a bigger buffer.
Actually, I have seen some problems when allocating large pieces of memory constantly. Occasionally, I see alloc_pages and kmalloc fails to allocate the memory I want. The whole point of allocating a large chunk of memory is to avoid extra memory copy because I need to run decompression algorithms on it. Or memory copy is cheaper? I'm also thinking of using slab allocator. The size of memory I need to allocate can change from 20KB to 128KB. Then I need quite a few slab allocators. Thanks, Da