On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Parmenides [off-list ref]wrote:

quoted

This flag PF_SUPERPRI, indicates used superuser privileges and not use
superuser privileges.

I get it. This is really a misunderstanding. Thanks a lot.

2011/9/8 rohan puri [off-list ref]:

quoted

Hi,

    When forking a child process, the copy_process() function will by
default clear the PF_SUPERPRIV flag, which indicates whether a process
use superuser privileges. That means a  superuser process will create
a child process does not has superuser privileges. I think the child
process of a superuser process should also be a superuser one, while
the child process of a normal process by default should also be a
normal one (except that the setuid bit of the child executable is turn
on). In both cases it is not necessary that the PF_SUPERPRIV flag to
be cleared.  So, I wonder why the PF_SUPERPRIV flag is cleared by
defult.


Hi,

This flag PF_SUPERPRI, indicates used superuser privileges and not use
superuser privileges. Which in any case, INDEPENDENT of all the processes
which have superuser privileges, whether they had used them or not and

for

quoted

those processes which do not have superuser privileges needs to be

cleared

quoted

for the child of them (since the child process has been just created and

at

quoted

this point in time it has not used the superuser privileges) Its a kind

of

quoted

initialization you can think of.

Regards,
Rohan.

Welcome :)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20110909/951c4c4b/attachment.html