Thanks Dave, it seems a very reasonable answer.

Regards,
Rohan.

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dave Hylands [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Rohan,

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:45 PM, rohan puri [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Thanks Darshan. I went through that section of the book. I do agree that
fork(), vfork() in turn calls the clone() sys call which internally calls
do_fork() method.

The doubt which I have is there is a sys_fork() method which gets called
when fork() system call is invoked. But from userspace is there any way

in

quoted

which we can make execute this code path, because if we make use of

fork()

quoted

it will call clone() sys call and follow that code path. What I am trying

to

quoted

figure out is that is that code (sys_fork() ) is redundant now or is
something still using it.

My guess is that the fork syscall is still there because it is part of
the kernel API. Yes the clone call made fork redundant. But since fork
was already part of the API, they left it in. This way programs which
might use alternative runtime libraries, or which perhaps do system
calls directly, will continue to work.

--
Dave Hylands
Shuswap, BC, Canada
http://www.davehylands.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20110908/8813c8e0/attachment-0001.html