Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 6 authors, 2011-08-29

question about oops and panic

From: anish singh <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-29 11:05:57

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Mandeep Sandhu
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
1. I think oops and panic are both some way to deal with errors occurs
in kernel space. Is there any relationship between them?
AFAIK both are same.
quoted
Really? I thought "oops" would be generated for critical errors like
processor exceptions etc when a kernel CANNOT proceed further in a
reliable way...whereas a "panic" was _artificially_ induced (?), eg: a
missing 'init' to run (very common error, which I'm sure most of us
here would've experienced :)), and the kernel _may_ proceed further
with some reliability
Thanks for this but what i meant was that some developers uses
oops and panic term interchangeably.
Technically you are right.
Wikipedia, has a decent explanation of it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel_oops

HTH,
-mandeep
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help