question about oops and panic
From: anish singh <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-29 11:05:57
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Mandeep Sandhu [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
1. I think oops and panic are both some way to deal with errors occurs in kernel space. Is there any relationship between them?AFAIK both are same.quoted
Really? I thought "oops" would be generated for critical errors like processor exceptions etc when a kernel CANNOT proceed further in a reliable way...whereas a "panic" was _artificially_ induced (?), eg: a missing 'init' to run (very common error, which I'm sure most of us here would've experienced :)), and the kernel _may_ proceed further with some reliability
Thanks for this but what i meant was that some developers uses oops and panic term interchangeably. Technically you are right.
Wikipedia, has a decent explanation of it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel_oops HTH, -mandeep