Hi,

Please find my reply inlined.


On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Prateek Sharma [off-list ref]wrote:

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Mulyadi Santosa <
mulyadi.santosa at gmail.com> wrote:

quoted

Hi///

On 09/08/2011, =/_00/\/\ [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi,

Thanks for replying
Here is one observation worth mentioning.
On boot system it shows Mapped < Cached (In fact much less)

quite predictable.... during booting phase, your system read() much by
doesn't mmap() that much....

quoted

After using system for some time following commands are executed.
# sync and echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_cache

Whenever above command is executed I can see Mapped > Cached.

by echoing "3" to drop_cache, you flush the content of page cache as
much as possible ...

Here is my understanding of what drop_page_cache does:
All page-cache pages are 'dropped' except the following:
1. Dirty pages. (they are *not* synced)
2. Mapped pages (pages 'in use' , mapped by rmap )
(There are a few more exceptions i dont recall now.)

But even in this case Cached (/proc/meminfo) should be always greater than
Mapped(/proc/meminfo)  (As it will contain mapped  + Unmapped pages)
I also saw that Cached (/proc/meminfo) does not include Buffer Cache.

========= fs/proc/meminfo.c ========
cached = global_page_state(NR_FILE_PAGES) -
                        total_swapcache_pages - i.bufferram;
==============================

Even if drop_cache is not done is it ever possible to get Cached < Mapped ?



Regards,
  ~/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20110810/8d9f2b00/attachment.html