One more question on alignment
From: subin gangadharan <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-06 22:56:26
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Daniel Baluta [off-list ref]wrote:
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 10:17 PM, subin gangadharan [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi, This is a text excerpt from the article [1]. Below paragraph I didn't understand quite well.Mainly in boldletters.Couldquoted
anybody please explain how this will lead to an infinite loop.It seems self-explanatory. Most atomic ops are written to retry upon a failed store, and on PowerPC an atomic store to an unaligned address always fails, thus the processor will infinitely try to store the value, without having the chance to fix the unaligned access (as would have happened if an exception was thrown).quoted
Unfortunately, the PowerPC does not throw an exception when atomically storing to an unaligned address. Instead, the store simply always fails. This is bad because most atomic functions are written to retry upon afailedquoted
store, under the assumption they were preempted. These two circumstances combine to where your program will go into an infinite loop if youattemptquoted
to atomically store to an unaligned address. Oops.thanks, Daniel.
Thanks Daniel, My bad, I was trying to connect the page fault explained before that paragraph and this one. Hence I got confused,again thanks for clarifying it. -- With Regards Subin Gangadharan Everything should be made as simple as possible,but not simpler. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20110806/0dc46c67/attachment.html