Fw: Question about interrupts
From: santhosh kumars <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-30 10:52:20
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:56 PM, manish honap [off-list ref] wrote:
Well 2.6.39 seems to have changed and the flow as I understand for interrupt processing is do_IRQ -> irq_enter -> handle_irq -> ... but in above flow i cant find local_irq_enable anywhere; is there some different trick used to enable the interrupts ?
yes in 2.6.34 i am able to find do_IRQ and handle_IRQ_event(), defined in kernel/irq/handler.c but with 2.6.39 its moved some where .Can any one please help me on this where this logic is moved.
----- Forwarded Message ---- From: santhosh kumars <redacted> To: manish honap <redacted> Cc: kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org Sent: Fri, 29 July, 2011 3:31:10 PM Subject: Re: Question about interrupts On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:16 PM, manish honap [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hello all, When interrupts are handled through interrupt gate cpu automatically clears IF flag. but to allow nesting kernel sets the IF flag in handle_irq_event - for 2.6.11 but in 2.6.39 how the interrupts are re-enabled so as to facilitate nesting of interrupts I am unable to find local_irq_enable in do_IRQ()I think in handle_IRQ_event event again interrupts are enabled if (!(action->flags & IRQF_DISABLED)) local_irq_enable_in_hardirq();quoted
Thanks in advance. _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies