Changes in block layer for IOScheduler Insertion selection
From: mani <hidden>
Date: 2011-05-30 05:23:16
Dear Eduardo,
I am using squashfs filesystem. So i am more concern with the read speed.
whereas below are the details
read speed write
speed
ELEVATOR_INSERT_SORT 8 MBps 5MBps
ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK 10 MBps 7.2MBps
used the following command for measurement for both the cases.
reading
hdparm -t /dev/mtdblock3
writing
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/mtd3 bs=4096 count=100k
As of now everything is working fine with those changes
but i am worried if these changes would have any adverse effect anywhere
?
Thanks.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Eduardo Silva [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:29 AM, mani [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Dear All, I am working on linux kernel 2.6.32.9 tegra NVIDIA board. I am getting ~8MBps speed of the Nand disk if i use hdparm hdparm -t /dev/mtdblock3 i made changes in block layer of kernel as below:- block/blk-core.c static inline void add_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request*req)quoted
{ drive_stat_acct(req, 1); /* * elevator indicated where it wants this request to be * inserted at elevator_merge time */ __elv_add_request(q, req, ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK, 0); //__elv_add_request(q, req, ELEVATOR_INSERT_SORT, 0); }What are the results for read and write for both cases ?quoted
changed ELEVATOR_INSERT_SORT to ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK it improves my NAND speed to 10MBps. I am using "noop" I/O scheduler. Will this change have any adverse effect in kernel ? or any other side effect as far as i am using only Nand no Hard disk. Thanks Mani _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies-- Eduardo Silva http://edsiper.linuxchile.cl http://www.monkey-project.com
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20110530/027b23f3/attachment.html