On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 20:17 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:

On Thu, 5 Aug 2021, Joe Perches wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 05:27 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 13:43 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:

quoted

The "= {};" style empty struct initializer is preferred over = {0}.
It avoids the situation where the first struct member is a pointer and
that generates a Sparse warning about assigning using zero instead of
NULL.  Also it's just nicer to look at.

Perhaps a cocci script like the below could help too:

$ cat zero_init_struct.cocci
@@
identifier name;
identifier t;
@@

	struct name t = {
-	       0
	};

@@
identifier name;
identifier t;
identifier member;
@@

	struct name t = {
	       ...,
		.member = {
-		0
		},
		...,
	};

My test turns up over 1900 occurrences.  There is the question of whether
{} or { } is preferred.  The above semantic patch replaces {0} by {} and
( 0 } by { }.

I saw that and I don't recall how to force one style or another
to be output.