Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2021-02-02

Re: [PATCH v2] nbd: Fix NULL pointer in flush_workqueue

From: Sun Ke <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-02 01:37:43
Also in: linux-block, lkml

hi,Markus

在 2021/2/2 3:05, Markus Elfring 写道:
quoted
+++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
@@ -2011,12 +2011,14 @@ static int nbd_genl_disconnect(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
  		       index);
  		return -EINVAL;
  	}
+	mutex_lock(&nbd->config_lock);
  	if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&nbd->refs)) {
-		mutex_unlock(&nbd_index_mutex);
-		printk(KERN_ERR "nbd: device at index %d is going down\n",
-		       index);
-		return -EINVAL;
+		goto unlock;
  	}
+	if (!nbd->recv_workq) {
+		goto unlock;
+	}
How do you think about to use the following patch variant
(so that unwanted curly brackets would be avoided for proposed single statements
in two if branches)?

+	mutex_lock(&nbd->config_lock);
-	if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&nbd->refs)) {
+	if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&nbd->refs) || !nbd->recv_workq) {
+		mutex_unlock(&nbd->config_lock);
  		mutex_unlock(&nbd_index_mutex);
  		printk(KERN_ERR "nbd: device at index %d is going down\n",tter
  		       index);
  		return -EINVAL;
  	}
It looks better,  thanks for your suggestion.
By the way:
Would you like to replace the following two statements by the statement
“goto put_nbd;” in another update step for this function implementation?

		nbd_put(nbd);
		return 0;
Sure, I will do it.
Regards,
Markus
Thanks,

Sun Ke
.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help