RE: [patch 1/2] HID: sensors: use GFP_ATOMIC under spinlock
From: Pandruvada, Srinivas <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-17 15:21:34
Also in:
linux-input
Tested this and works. -----Original Message----- From: Jiri Kosina [mailto:jkosina@suse.cz] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 3:59 AM To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Pandruvada, Srinivas; linux-input@vger.kernel.org; kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Cameron Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] HID: sensors: use GFP_ATOMIC under spinlock On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Dan Carpenter wrote:
We're holding a spinlock here so we can't call kmalloc() with GFP_KERNEL. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <redacted> Jonathan, could you please take this one as well, as it depends on the series in your tree? Thanks.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.cb/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c index 4ac759c..0c93b10 100644--- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ int sensor_hub_register_callback(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev, spin_unlock(&pdata->dyn_callback_lock); return -EINVAL; } - callback = kzalloc(sizeof(*callback), GFP_KERNEL); + callback = kzalloc(sizeof(*callback), GFP_ATOMIC); if (!callback) { spin_unlock(&pdata->dyn_callback_lock); return -ENOMEM;@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ static int sensor_hub_raw_event(struct hid_device *hdev, if (pdata->pending.status && pdata->pending.attr_usage_id = report->field[i]->usage->hid) { hid_dbg(hdev, "data was pending ...\n"); - pdata->pending.raw_data = kmalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL); + pdata->pending.raw_data = kmalloc(sz, GFP_ATOMIC); if (pdata->pending.raw_data) { memcpy(pdata->pending.raw_data, ptr, sz); pdata->pending.raw_size = sz;
-- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs