On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 06:18:46PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 08:00:42AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:56:23AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:

quoted

What prompted this patch is that in dma_pool_create() we call
dev_to_node() before checking whether "dev" is NULL.  It looks like
there are places which call dma_pool_create() with a NULL pointer.  An
example is in drivers/usb/gadget/amd5536udc.c.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>
---
Static checker fix.

diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
index aa7b3b4..c80e7a8d 100644
--- a/include/linux/device.h
+++ b/include/linux/device.h

@@ -714,7 +714,9 @@ int dev_set_name(struct device *dev, const char *name, ...);
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
 static inline int dev_to_node(struct device *dev)
 {
-	return dev->numa_node;
+	if (dev)
+		return dev->numa_node;
+	return -1;

What happens if this function returns -1?  Can the callers properly
handle this?

Gar.  Now I'm not sure any more.

-1 means no affinity and it's what the dev_to_node() returns if NUMA
is disabled.  But now I think probably it's important to get the
NUMA node correct in dma_pool_create() so this isn't the right
answer.

dma_pool_create() is not correct.  It has code to handle a NULL
"dev" pointer, but the dev_to_node() dereference will cause an oops
before we reach it.  I'm think this is a real issue that affects a
couple drivers.  Maybe those people compile without NUMA?

I'm not sure the right fix now.

Ok, I'll drop this one then.

greg k-h