Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 3 authors, 2021-07-19

Re: [syzbot] INFO: task hung in io_sq_thread_park (2)

From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-07-19 18:27:16
Also in: lkml

On 7/19/21 6:13 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 7/19/21 10:57 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
quoted
On 7/16/21 11:57 AM, syzbot wrote:
quoted
Hello,

syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
WARNING in io_uring_cancel_generic
__arm_poll doesn't remove a second poll entry in case of failed
__io_queue_proc(), it's most likely the cause here.

#syz test: https://github.com/isilence/linux.git syztest_sqpoll_hang
Was my thought on seeing the last debug run too. Haven't written a test
case, but my initial thought was catching this at the time that double
poll is armed, in __io_queue_proc(). Totally untested, just tossing
it out there.
Wouldn't help, unfortunately, the way syz triggers it is making a
request to go through __io_queue_proc() three times.

Either it's 3 waitqueues or we need to extend the check below to
the double poll entry.

if (poll_one->head == head)
	return;
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 0cac361bf6b8..ed33de5fffd2 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -5002,6 +5002,9 @@ static void __io_queue_proc(struct io_poll_iocb *poll, struct io_poll_table *pt,
 	if (unlikely(poll->head)) {
 		struct io_poll_iocb *poll_one = poll;
 
+		/* first poll failed, don't arm double poll */
+		if (pt->error)
+			return;
 		/* already have a 2nd entry, fail a third attempt */
 		if (*poll_ptr) {
 			pt->error = -EINVAL;
-- 
Pavel Begunkov
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help