Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/7] block: add iopoll method for non-mq device
From: JeffleXu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: 2021-01-08 03:25:21
Also in:
dm-devel, linux-block
On 1/8/21 5:47 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23 2020 at 6:26am -0500, Jeffle Xu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
->poll_fn is introduced in commit ea435e1b9392 ("block: add a poll_fn callback to struct request_queue") for supporting non-mq queues such as nvme multipath, but removed in commit 529262d56dbe ("block: remove ->poll_fn"). To add support of IO polling for non-mq device, this method need to be back. Since commit c62b37d96b6e ("block: move ->make_request_fn to struct block_device_operations") has moved all callbacks into struct block_device_operations in gendisk, we also add the new method named ->iopoll in block_device_operations.Please update patch subject and header to: block: add iopoll method to support bio-based IO polling ->poll_fn was introduced in commit ea435e1b9392 ("block: add a poll_fn callback to struct request_queue") to support bio-based queues such as nvme multipath, but was later removed in commit 529262d56dbe ("block: remove ->poll_fn"). Given commit c62b37d96b6e ("block: move ->make_request_fn to struct block_device_operations") restore the possibility of bio-based IO polling support by adding an ->iopoll method to gendisk->fops. Elevate bulk of blk_mq_poll() implementation to blk_poll() and reduce blk_mq_poll() to blk-mq specific code that is called from blk_poll().quoted
Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> --- block/blk-core.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ block/blk-mq.c | 70 +++++-------------------------------- include/linux/blk-mq.h | 3 ++ include/linux/blkdev.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c index 96e5fcd7f071..2f5c51ce32e3 100644 --- a/block/blk-core.c +++ b/block/blk-core.c@@ -1131,6 +1131,85 @@ blk_qc_t submit_bio(struct bio *bio) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(submit_bio); +static bool blk_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie) +{ + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx; + + /* TODO: bio-based device doesn't support hybrid poll. */ + if (!queue_is_mq(q)) + return false; + + hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)]; + if (blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, hctx, cookie)) + return true; + + hctx->poll_considered++; + return false; +}I don't see where you ever backfill bio-based hybrid support (in the following patches in this series, so it is lingering TODO).
Yes the hybrid polling is not implemented and thus bypassed for bio-based device currently.
quoted
+ +/** + * blk_poll - poll for IO completions + * @q: the queue + * @cookie: cookie passed back at IO submission time + * @spin: whether to spin for completions + * + * Description: + * Poll for completions on the passed in queue. Returns number of + * completed entries found. If @spin is true, then blk_poll will continue + * looping until at least one completion is found, unless the task is + * otherwise marked running (or we need to reschedule). + */ +int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin) +{ + long state; + + if (!blk_qc_t_valid(cookie) || + !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &q->queue_flags)) + return 0; + + if (current->plug) + blk_flush_plug_list(current->plug, false); + + /* + * If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset + * the state. Like for the other success return cases, the + * caller is responsible for checking if the IO completed. If + * the IO isn't complete, we'll get called again and will go + * straight to the busy poll loop. If specified not to spin, + * we also should not sleep. + */ + if (spin && blk_poll_hybrid(q, cookie)) + return 1; + + state = current->state; + do { + int ret; + struct gendisk *disk = queue_to_disk(q); + + if (disk->fops->iopoll) + ret = disk->fops->iopoll(q, cookie); + else + ret = blk_mq_poll(q, cookie);
The original code is indeed buggy. For bio-based device, ->iopoll() may not be implemented while QUEUE_FLAG_POLL flag is still set, in which case blk_mq_poll() will be called for this bio-based device.
Really don't like that blk-mq is needlessly getting gendisk and checking
disk->fops->iopoll.
This is just to give an idea, whitespace damaged due to coding in mail
client, but why not remove above blk_poll_hybrid() and do:
struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = NULL;
struct gendisk *disk = NULL;
...
if (queue_is_mq(q)) {
/*
* If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset
* the state. Like for the other success return cases, the
* caller is responsible for checking if the IO completed. If
* the IO isn't complete, we'll get called again and will go
* straight to the busy poll loop. If specified not to spin,
* we also should not sleep.
*/
hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)];
if (spin && blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, hctx, cookie))
return 1;
hctx->poll_considered++;
} else {
disk = queue_to_disk(q);
}
do {
int ret;
if (hctx)
ret = blk_mq_poll(q, hctx, cookie);
else if (disk->fops->iopoll)
ret = disk->fops->iopoll(q, cookie);
Regards.
quoted
+ if (ret > 0) { + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); + return ret; + } + + if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); + + if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING) + return 1; + if (ret < 0 || !spin) + break; + cpu_relax(); + } while (!need_resched()); + + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_poll); + /** * blk_cloned_rq_check_limits - Helper function to check a cloned request * for the new queue limitsdiff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index b09ce00cc6af..85258958e9f1 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c@@ -3818,8 +3818,8 @@ static bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid_sleep(struct request_queue *q, return true; } -static bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q, - struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie) +bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q, + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie) { struct request *rq;@@ -3843,72 +3843,20 @@ static bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q, return blk_mq_poll_hybrid_sleep(q, rq); } -/** - * blk_poll - poll for IO completions - * @q: the queue - * @cookie: cookie passed back at IO submission time - * @spin: whether to spin for completions - * - * Description: - * Poll for completions on the passed in queue. Returns number of - * completed entries found. If @spin is true, then blk_poll will continue - * looping until at least one completion is found, unless the task is - * otherwise marked running (or we need to reschedule). - */ -int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin) +int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie) { + int ret; struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx; - long state; - - if (!blk_qc_t_valid(cookie) || - !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &q->queue_flags)) - return 0; - - if (current->plug) - blk_flush_plug_list(current->plug, false); hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)];Given my suggested code changes above, pass hctx in to blk_mq_poll() to avoid redundant code to access it in q->queue_hw_ctx[], so: int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie)
Regards.
quoted
- /* - * If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset - * the state. Like for the other success return cases, the - * caller is responsible for checking if the IO completed. If - * the IO isn't complete, we'll get called again and will go - * straight to the busy poll loop. If specified not to spin, - * we also should not sleep. - */ - if (spin && blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, hctx, cookie)) - return 1; - - hctx->poll_considered++; + hctx->poll_invoked++; + ret = q->mq_ops->poll(hctx); + if (ret > 0) + hctx->poll_success++; - state = current->state; - do { - int ret; - - hctx->poll_invoked++; - - ret = q->mq_ops->poll(hctx); - if (ret > 0) { - hctx->poll_success++; - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); - return ret; - } - - if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); - - if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING) - return 1; - if (ret < 0 || !spin) - break; - cpu_relax(); - } while (!need_resched()); - - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); - return 0; + return ret; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_poll); unsigned int blk_mq_rq_cpu(struct request *rq) {diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h index 47b021952ac7..032e08ecd42e 100644 --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h@@ -607,6 +607,9 @@ static inline void blk_rq_bio_prep(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio, } blk_qc_t blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio); +int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie); +bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q, + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie); void blk_mq_hctx_set_fq_lock_class(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct lock_class_key *key);diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h index 2303d06a5a82..e8965879eb90 100644 --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h@@ -1845,6 +1845,7 @@ static inline void blk_ksm_unregister(struct request_queue *q) { } struct block_device_operations { blk_qc_t (*submit_bio) (struct bio *bio); + int (*iopoll)(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie); int (*open) (struct block_device *, fmode_t); void (*release) (struct gendisk *, fmode_t); int (*rw_page)(struct block_device *, sector_t, struct page *, unsigned int);-- 2.27.0 -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel-- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
-- Thanks, Jeffle