Re: [igt-dev] [RFC PATCH i-g-t] lib/i915/perf: Fix non-card0 processing
From: Janusz Krzysztofik <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-05 09:56:53
Also in:
intel-gfx
Hi Lionel, On poniedziałek, 3 maja 2021 09:07:09 CEST Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 30/04/2021 19:18, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:quoted
IGT i915/perf library functions now always operate on sysfs perf attributes of card0 device node, no matter which DRM device fd a user passes. The intention was to always switch to primary device node if a user passes a render device node fd, but that breaks handling of non-card0 devices. Instead of forcibly using DRM device minor number 0 when opening a device sysfs area, convert device minor number of a user passed device fd to the minor number of respective primary (cardX) device node. Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <redacted> --- lib/i915/perf.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/lib/i915/perf.c b/lib/i915/perf.c index 56d5c0b3a..336824df7 100644 --- a/lib/i915/perf.c +++ b/lib/i915/perf.c@@ -376,8 +376,8 @@ open_master_sysfs_dir(int drm_fd) if (fstat(drm_fd, &st) || !S_ISCHR(st.st_mode)) return -1; - snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/sys/dev/char/%d:0", - major(st.st_rdev)); + snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/sys/dev/char/%d:%d", + major(st.st_rdev), minor(st.st_rdev) & ~128);Isn't it minor(st.st_rdev) & 0xff ?
Did you mean 0x7f?
or even 0x3f ? Looks like /dev/dri/controlD64 can exist too.
Not any longer, see commit 0d49f303e8a7 ("drm: remove all control node code").
However, my approach of applying a mask is oversimplified. Minor numbers for
different node types (primary and render) are handled separately. I'm going
to propose a method similar to that implemented in igt_debugfs_path().
Thanks,
Janusz
-Lionelquoted
return open(path, O_DIRECTORY); }
_______________________________________________ igt-dev mailing list igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev