Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-09-06 17:51:56)

Probably just leftover code that escaped review.

The '//' indicates a wish that igt_ci_fail_on() existed. The problem as
it currently stands is that we don't get a big warning to update this
test for future gen. iirc the intent was to try and reinforce that this
was a test limitation for CI and shouldn't alarm any other user.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev