Re: [PATCH] notes: do not drop notes written by a concurrent process

From
Farid Zakaria <hidden>
Date
2026-10-29 22:16:03
Reply to
Junio C Hamano, 2026-10-29
On Thu Oct 29, 2026 at 2:42 PM PDT, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"Farid Zakaria" [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I felt confident reviewing the current patch at it's current state
(AI-assisted) and I do concur that it's a net-positive change in the
interim.
Sorry, but I find the above very confusing, and I cannot figure out
who is reviewing whose patch, and who is concuring whose statement
that said what.
It's because I bottom-posted; I thought it might be easier to read that
way -- I guess not.

I was just trying to say that I felt confident in my comprehension of
this current patch, and agreed with Kristoffer that it's a positive
change as it stands, although the algorithm could be improved to handle
cases with different branches as mentioned.

(hopefully that's a little more concise and clear)
Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 4 authors, last reply 4d ago
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help