Re: [PATCH 0/3] [doc] Remove gittutorial-2

Is this the "two series" approach you mentioned earlier?

The idea is that:

1. we delete gittutorial-2 (this series)
2. we delete gittutorial
3. we add a new gittutorial

We could also combine #2 and #3 into a single series.
I don't feel strongly about that and it might (as you mention below)
be better to wait to delete gittutorial until we have a replacement
ready to go.

There is no need to ensure that the new document that replaces the
old one covers everything the old one did.  After all, giving us a
clean slate and letting us choose what to cover (and, more
importantly, what not to cover) with fresh eyes to match the needs
of today's world is the whole point of redoing the tutorial
document.

So I personally feel it is OK to remove the old one, without
promising or even hinting at what in the new one that replaces it.
But we would want to see its replacement in the not-so-distant
future.

I'm not planning to replace gittutorial-2 since the material in it
is already covered by gitdatamodel and gitcore-tutorial.
Let me know if you disagree!

Also, we may want to decide what to do with gittutorial.  It is
short and reasonably sweet.  One old-fashioned thing that does not
exactly match today's prevalent usage patterns may be that it starts
tracking a new project from a tarball, but other than that, it may
not hurt to keep it around.  I do not know.

We definitely want a tutorial that covers `git init`, `git add`, `git commit`,
etc. Any replacement would definitely cover those topics, but 
I don't see the value of having 2 such tutorials.
Why do you think it would be valuable to keep it around? It seems
like it would cause a lot of confusion to me.