Re: [PATCH 2/7] [doc] git-merge: link to new merge conflicts guide
From: Ben Knoble <hidden>
Date: 2026-09-25 19:34:22
Le 25 sept. 2026 à 12:59, Julia Evans [off-list ref] a écrit : quoted
On Fri, Sep 25, 2026, at 12:36 PM, D. Ben Knoble wrote: Hi Julia,
[snip]
quoted
The second is a very useful way to get more context to help resolve conflicts! I have an alias "conflict = log --oneline --graph --left-right --boundary --merge" for a similar purpose, and I think the new guide should help folks discover --merge. Often I can get a better sense of how to resolve conflicts by comparing the original changes on each side, or I might at least know who to ask about what to do.Thanks, I meant to flag this: the reason I deleted it was really just that I couldn't understand what `git log --merge -p <path>` did from the documentation and so I removed it until I could figure it out. I thought that `--merge` meant that it had something to do with merge commits, but upon further investigation it looks like that's not true, and that `--merges` is related to merge commits, `--merge` is something totally different which is relevant any time there's a conflict My best guess now is that it would make sense to include this under "Tools to get more context". Maybe something like this:quoted
`git log --merge -p <filename>` will print out all commits which caused the merge conflict for `<filename>`, and the diff of how they changed the file.("which caused the merge conflict for" is a little more vague, but I'm trying to convey the intent, and hopefully folks can look at `man git log` if they want to know the specifics) This does sound really useful.
That reads well enough for me! Thanks.