Re: [PATCH 1/2] t3507: pin CHERRY_PICK_HEAD absence for a conflicting --no-commit

Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref] writes:

But we need to have a better argument than "we didn't have it yet".

Correcting my earlier mail: I said I was dropping the test because the
existing clean-pick test covered it, and that is wrong. The clean pick
is checked, the conflicting one is not.

The justification is the condition itself: whether CHERRY_PICK_HEAD is
written depends on the command, on whether the merge started, and on
--no-commit, all in one place. v3 puts it back as a single
test_ref_missing call in an existing test, so no new test and no new
setup.