Re: [PATCH] push: fix --force-if-includes when remote-tracking ref has no reflog

Aleksei Sviridkin [off-list ref] writes:

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

your sign-off must be the last line in the trailers.

I took Assisted-by from the kernel, which asks for it. I could not find
anything either way in git's guidelines, so I followed the kernel. I will
put the sign-off last in v2, and drop Assisted-by if you would rather not
have it.

We are not the kernel ;-)

Quite honestly, I would rather not have patches filled with AI slop
that is often walls of text filled with "eh, that may not be wrong
per-se, but is it relevant?" descriptions and we can never tell what
was used as the original material to copy from.  I prefer patches
with human-readable explanations and known origin.

Thanks.