Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] checkout: validate stage and merge option compatibility in checkout_paths()
From: Karthik Nayak <hidden>
Date: 2026-09-02 11:20:55
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Karthik Nayak [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
@@ -591,6 +591,10 @@ static int checkout_paths(const struct checkout_opts *opts, die(_("'%s', '%s', or '%s' cannot be used when checking out of a tree"), "--merge", "--ours", "--theirs"); + if (1 < !!opts->writeout_stage + !!opts->force + !!opts->merge) + die(_("git checkout: --ours/--theirs, --force and --merge are incompatible when\n" + "checking out of the index.")); +Doesn't checkout_paths() also get triggered when using '--patch', shouldn't this go below...quoted
if (opts->patch_mode) { enum add_p_mode patch_mode; struct interactive_options interactive_opts = {...this block? As the original checked for `opts->patchspec.nr`Sorry, I do not quite understand your question. The "if (opts->patch_mode)" block indeed appears in checkout_paths() and when "--patch" is given the control comes here. Are you worried about git restore --patch --merge --theirs triggering the option compatibility check, instead of ignoring it and directly jumping into the patch mode?
Sorry if I was unclear. I was stating that the condition udner which the check runs is now difference. Previously we checked `opts->pathspec.nr`, but now `checkout_paths()` is also entered for '--patch' without any path spec. Having a closer look, it seems to be okay. Because in patch mode, each of the combinations is already rejected before in `checkout_paths()`. It still might be good to have a sentence in a the commit message, since the guard did change and the reasoning why that is safe is not so obvious. This does however change the precedence of the error messages: $ git.master restore --staged --theirs --merge foo fatal: git checkout: --ours/--theirs, --force and --merge are incompatible when checking out of the index. $ git.patch restore --staged --theirs --merge foo fatal: '--ours' or '--theirs' cannot be used with --staged This seems okay to me, not sure if we have tests to validate this behavior.
quoted
quoted
@@ -2063,11 +2067,7 @@ static int checkout_main(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, opts->pathspec.recursive = 1; - if (opts->pathspec.nr) { - if (1 < !!opts->writeout_stage + !!opts->force + !!opts->merge) - die(_("git checkout: --ours/--theirs, --force and --merge are incompatible when\n" - "checking out of the index.")); - } else { + if (!opts->pathspec.nr) { if (opts->accept_pathspec && !opts->empty_pathspec_ok && !opts->patch_mode) /* patch mode is special */ die(_("you must specify path(s) to restore")); --2.55.0-884-g76cf8659c2
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 690 bytes