Thread (58 messages) flat view 58 messages, 6 authors, 23d ago

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] odb: introduce interface to generate packfiles

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2026-08-20 17:04:57

Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Packfiles have two primary use cases:

  - They are used to store objects at rest in a Git repository.

  - They are used on the transport layer to transfer objects between two
    repositories.

The first class is closely tied to a given object database backend, and
as such this use is highly specific to how such a backend decides to
store its data. This shows in git-pack-objects(1), which is used by
git-repack(1) et al to optimize the object database, which supports lots
of options that are closely coupled with how data is stored.

But the second class is quite a lot more generic: we don't care about
specifics of how the object database stores its objects, but to generate
the packfiles we only care about the object graph itself. Still, this
use case is also coupled with git-pack-objects(1).

Unfortunately, because git-pack-objects(1) covers both classes, the
result is that it is very hard to port the whole command to properly
support pluggable object databases. There are simply way too many
options that an alternative implementation will have a very hard time to
support in the first place.

And despite being hard to implement, it's also quite unnecessary to
implement those backend-specific options. Optimizing the object database
has already been made pluggable, and an alternative implementation is
unlikely to care about cruft packs, unpacked objects, keep packs and the
like. But we still need to make at least _parts_ of the packfile
generation pluggable so that backends can generate packfiles for the
transport layer itself.

Introduce a new interface that lets backends generate a new packfile and
implement that interface for the "files" backend. The options supported
by the callback are exactly the set of options that are required for the
transport layer, but nothing more.

This means that git-pack-objects(1) itself cannot be ported over to this
new interface, but as explained above that's a hard feat to pull off due
to the backend-specific features. Ideally though, we should expose the
ability to generate arbitrary packfiles using this interface. The intent
of this is to eventually introduce a git-objects(1) subcommand (similar
to git-refs(1)) that exposes generic interfaces for accessing everything
related to the object database. In that case, we are able to expose only
those options that are generic.

Subsequent commits will convert git-upload-pack(1), git-send-pack(1) and
git-bundle(1) to use this interface.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <redacted>
---
 odb.c              |  21 ++++++++
 odb.h              | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 odb/source-files.c | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 odb/source.h       |  33 ++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 355 insertions(+)
diff --git a/odb.c b/odb.c
index caf1d0f542..cd9d5b48bc 100644
--- a/odb.c
+++ b/odb.c
@@ -1046,6 +1046,27 @@ bool odb_optimize_required(struct object_database *odb,
 	return odb_source_optimize_required(odb->sources, opts);
 }
 
+void odb_generate_pack_options_release(struct odb_generate_pack_options *opts)
+{
+	oid_array_clear(&opts->wants);
+	oid_array_clear(&opts->haves);
+	oid_array_clear(&opts->shallows);
+}
+
+int odb_generate_pack(struct object_database *odb,
+		      struct odb_pack_generator **out,
+		      const struct odb_generate_pack_options *opts)
+{
+	if (!odb->sources->generate_pack)
+		return error(_("primary object source does not support generating packfiles"));
+	return odb_source_generate_pack(odb->sources, out, opts);
+}
Perhaps a stupid question but the opts->pack_fd is documented:
+struct odb_generate_pack_options {
...
+	/*
+	 * File descriptor that the generated pack shall be written to. If set
+	 * to `-1`, a pipe will be created and exposed via the pack generator's
+	 * `out` field. If set to `0`, the pack will be written to the standard
+	 * output stream. Otherwise, the provided descriptor will be written to
+	 * and is consumed by the generator.
+	 */
+	int pack_fd;
+
Here I assume that "and is consumed by" refers to "generator writes
into it and then closes it when it is done"?

odb_source_generate_pack() delegate to source->generate_pack(),
which I presume goes to odb_source_files_generate_pack(), which in
turn assigns opts->pack_fd to cp->out and calls start_command(cp) to
run pack-objects.  The file descriptor is closed when the process
finishes.

What happens if the odb->sources[0] does not support .generate_pack?
Should opts->pack_fd be "consumed" here to avoid leaking it, or we
do not have to worry about it because the caller will soon exit
itself?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help