Thread (265 messages) 265 messages, 6 authors, 20h ago

Re: [PATCH v18 2/7] branch: convert delete_branches() to a flags argument

From: Phillip Wood <hidden>
Date: 2026-07-13 15:28:08

Hi Harald

On 10/07/2026 18:25, Harald Nordgren wrote:
quoted
This means we have two sources of truth because we modify "flags" later.
The idea of replacing the old function parameters with local variables
only works if we're not passing the flags variable on to another
function so I think we should replace all instances of "force" and
"quiet" with flags & DELETE_BRANCH_FORCE/QUIET. That way we have a
single source of truth and should avoid any future regressions like the
one we saw in an earlier iteration.
Yes, it makes sense.

I just hope we remember this discussion, so another reviewer doesn't
push in the other direction later because it seems like low-hanging
fruit.
If you explain why we're using flags as the source of truth, rather than 
replacing the function parameters with local variables in this function 
that should not be a problem.

Thanks

Phillip
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help