[PATCH 08/11] revision: avoid dereferencing NULL in `add_parents_only()`
From: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <hidden>
Date: 2026-07-09 09:42:51
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
From: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>
This function resolves revision suffixes like commit^@ (all parents),
commit^! (commit minus parents), and commit^-N (exclude Nth parent). It
calls `get_reference()` in a loop to peel through tag objects until it
reaches a commit.
The existing NULL check after `get_reference()` only handles the
ignore_missing case, but get_reference() can return NULL through three
distinct paths:
1. revs->ignore_missing: the caller asked to silently skip missing
objects.
2. revs->exclude_promisor_objects: the object is a lazy promisor
object that should be excluded from the walk.
3. revs->do_not_die_on_missing_objects: the caller wants to record
missing OIDs for later reporting (used by `git rev-list
--missing=print`) rather than dying.
In the latter two instances, the code falls through to dereference the
NULL pointer.
Handle all three cases explicitly:
- ignore_missing: return 0, matching the existing behavior and
the pattern in `handle_revision_arg()`.
- do_not_die_on_missing_objects: return 0. The missing OID has already
been recorded in `revs->missing_commits` by `get_reference()`.
Returning 0 is consistent with `handle_revision_arg()` and
`process_parents()`, both of which continue without error when this flag
is set. The broader codebase pattern for this flag is "record and
continue": list-objects.c, builtin/rev-list.c, and process_parents
all skip the die/error and keep walking.
- everything else (only the `exclude_promisor_objects` case in
practice): return -1, consistent with `handle_revision_arg()` where
the condition only matches `ignore_missing` or
`do_not_die_on_missing_objects`, falling through to ret = -1 for the
promisor case.
Note: the callers of `add_parents_only()` in
`handle_revision_pseudo_opt()` treat any nonzero return as "handled"
(`if (add_parents_only(...)) { ret = 0; }`), so the -1 for the promisor
case is indistinguishable from success there. This means a
promisor-excluded tag target referenced via commit^@ would be silently
skipped rather than producing an error. This is a pre-existing
limitation of the caller's return value handling and not made worse by
this change; the alternative (a NULL dereference crash) _would be_
strictly worse.
Pointed out by Coverity.
Assisted-by: Claude Opus 4.6
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>
---
revision.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
index e91d7e1f11..7f3999b551 100644
--- a/revision.c
+++ b/revision.c@@ -1903,8 +1903,13 @@ static int add_parents_only(struct rev_info *revs, const char *arg_, int flags, return 0; while (1) { it = get_reference(revs, arg, &oid, 0); - if (!it && revs->ignore_missing) - return 0; + if (!it) { + if (revs->ignore_missing) + return 0; + if (revs->do_not_die_on_missing_objects) + return 0; + return -1; + } if (it->type != OBJ_TAG) break; if (!((struct tag*)it)->tagged)
--
gitgitgadget