Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref] writes:

The same comment as [2/9] about 32 vs 64 in the subject "skip
EXPENSIVE test that is broken without SIZE_T_IS_32BIT" applies here,
I think.

...
-test_expect_success EXPENSIVE 'status does not re-read unchanged 4 or 8 GiB file' '
+test_expect_success EXPENSIVE,SIZE_T_IS_64BIT 'status does not re-read unchanged 4 or 8 GiB file' '
 	(
 		mkdir large-file &&
 		cd large-file &&