On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 02:58:41PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

quoted

According to my grep results are there 17 callsites for odb_reprepare(),
then I agree it makes sense to create this wrapper.

Yeah, I was a bit torn myself whether or not to keep the wrapper. I
eventually decided to just keep it because it reduces churn, and it's a
trivial wrapper anyway.

That sounds OK.  Are we all happy with the current shape of the
topic?  I myself did not find anything iffy in these two patches.

Based on Toon's reply [1] it seems like this series is ready to go.
Thanks!

Patrick

[1]: [ref]