Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 4 authors, 2026-06-04

Re: [PATCH v2] rebase: skip branch symref aliases

From: Phillip Wood <hidden>
Date: 2026-06-04 15:37:52

On 03/06/2026 11:27, Son Luong Ngoc via GitGitGadget wrote:
From: Son Luong Ngoc <redacted>

git rebase --update-refs can fail after the normal rebase path has
updated the current branch when another local branch is a symref to it.
This can happen during a default-branch rename where refs/heads/main
points at refs/heads/master while users migrate.

The sequencer queues update-ref commands from local branch decorations.
Commit 106b6885c7 (rebase: ignore non-branch update-refs) filters out
decorations that are not local branches, such as HEAD and tags. A branch
symref is different: it is still a local branch decoration, but if it
resolves to another branch then that target branch is itself present in
the decoration list and will be updated as a concrete branch.

Skip branch decorations whose symrefs resolve to refs/heads/*, because
those targets are already represented by concrete branch decorations.
This prevents aliases from scheduling a second update for the same
branch. Keep symrefs to non-branch targets on the existing path.
Makes sense
Preserve the existing checked-out branch handling before applying these
skips. Such refs still need a todo-list comment instead of an update-ref
command, even when the checked-out ref is the branch being rebased or a
branch symref alias. Use a copy of the resolved HEAD ref so later ref
resolution does not overwrite it.
I don't quite understand this. A symref that points to another branch 
should always be skipped. When we look up which branches are checked out 
(see worktree.c:add_head_info()) we use

  	refs_resolve_ref_unsafe(get_worktree_ref_store(wt),
				 "HEAD",
				 0,
				 &wt->head_oid, &flags);

so it will never report a symref as being checked out - it always 
resolves any symrefs first.

If we have a symref pointing somewhere outside of "refs/heads" then we 
need to check whether the target is checked out, not the symref itself. 
I'm not sure how likely that is to happen in practice.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
index 1ee4b2875b..6ab8b47108 100644
--- a/sequencer.c
+++ b/sequencer.c
@@ -6445,28 +6445,46 @@ static int add_decorations_to_list(const struct commit *commit,
  				   struct todo_add_branch_context *ctx)
  {
  	const struct name_decoration *decoration = get_name_decoration(&commit->object);
-	const char *head_ref = refs_resolve_ref_unsafe(get_main_ref_store(the_repository),
-						       "HEAD",
-						       RESOLVE_REF_READING,
-						       NULL,
-						       NULL);
+	struct ref_store *refs = get_main_ref_store(the_repository);
+	char *head_ref = refs_resolve_refdup(refs, "HEAD",
+					     RESOLVE_REF_READING,
+					     NULL, NULL);
This part and the test look good now
  	while (decoration) {
  		struct todo_item *item;
  		const char *path;
+		const char *resolved_ref;
+		int flags = 0;
  		size_t base_offset = ctx->buf->len;
  
  		/*
-		 * If the branch is the current HEAD, then it will be
-		 * updated by the default rebase behavior.
-		 * Exclude it from the list of refs to update,
-		 * as well as any non-branch decorations.
  		 * Non-branch decorations may be present if the pretty format
  		 * includes "%d", which would have loaded all refs
  		 * into the global decoration table.
  		 */
-		if ((head_ref && !strcmp(head_ref, decoration->name)) ||
-		    (decoration->type != DECORATION_REF_LOCAL)) {
+		if (decoration->type != DECORATION_REF_LOCAL) {
+			decoration = decoration->next;
+			continue;
+		}
If a decoration matches the current branch why don't we just skip it 
like we used to? (As an aside the existing code in wrong because if the 
user runs "git rebase --update-refs <upstream> <branch>" HEAD does not 
point to "<branch>" but lets not worry about that now)
+		path = branch_checked_out(decoration->name);
As I said above if the symref target is anther branch we should skip it 
and if the target is not a branch then we need to check if the target is 
checked out so we need to resolve the ref before calling 
branch_checked_out().

Thanks

Phillip
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help