Re: [PATCH v2] rebase: skip branch symref aliases
From: Phillip Wood <hidden>
Date: 2026-06-04 15:37:52
On 03/06/2026 11:27, Son Luong Ngoc via GitGitGadget wrote:
From: Son Luong Ngoc <redacted> git rebase --update-refs can fail after the normal rebase path has updated the current branch when another local branch is a symref to it. This can happen during a default-branch rename where refs/heads/main points at refs/heads/master while users migrate. The sequencer queues update-ref commands from local branch decorations. Commit 106b6885c7 (rebase: ignore non-branch update-refs) filters out decorations that are not local branches, such as HEAD and tags. A branch symref is different: it is still a local branch decoration, but if it resolves to another branch then that target branch is itself present in the decoration list and will be updated as a concrete branch. Skip branch decorations whose symrefs resolve to refs/heads/*, because those targets are already represented by concrete branch decorations. This prevents aliases from scheduling a second update for the same branch. Keep symrefs to non-branch targets on the existing path.
Makes sense
Preserve the existing checked-out branch handling before applying these skips. Such refs still need a todo-list comment instead of an update-ref command, even when the checked-out ref is the branch being rebased or a branch symref alias. Use a copy of the resolved HEAD ref so later ref resolution does not overwrite it.
I don't quite understand this. A symref that points to another branch should always be skipped. When we look up which branches are checked out (see worktree.c:add_head_info()) we use refs_resolve_ref_unsafe(get_worktree_ref_store(wt), "HEAD", 0, &wt->head_oid, &flags); so it will never report a symref as being checked out - it always resolves any symrefs first. If we have a symref pointing somewhere outside of "refs/heads" then we need to check whether the target is checked out, not the symref itself. I'm not sure how likely that is to happen in practice.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c index 1ee4b2875b..6ab8b47108 100644 --- a/sequencer.c +++ b/sequencer.c@@ -6445,28 +6445,46 @@ static int add_decorations_to_list(const struct commit *commit, struct todo_add_branch_context *ctx) { const struct name_decoration *decoration = get_name_decoration(&commit->object); - const char *head_ref = refs_resolve_ref_unsafe(get_main_ref_store(the_repository), - "HEAD", - RESOLVE_REF_READING, - NULL, - NULL); + struct ref_store *refs = get_main_ref_store(the_repository); + char *head_ref = refs_resolve_refdup(refs, "HEAD", + RESOLVE_REF_READING, + NULL, NULL);
This part and the test look good now
while (decoration) {
struct todo_item *item;
const char *path;
+ const char *resolved_ref;
+ int flags = 0;
size_t base_offset = ctx->buf->len;
/*
- * If the branch is the current HEAD, then it will be
- * updated by the default rebase behavior.
- * Exclude it from the list of refs to update,
- * as well as any non-branch decorations.
* Non-branch decorations may be present if the pretty format
* includes "%d", which would have loaded all refs
* into the global decoration table.
*/
- if ((head_ref && !strcmp(head_ref, decoration->name)) ||
- (decoration->type != DECORATION_REF_LOCAL)) {
+ if (decoration->type != DECORATION_REF_LOCAL) {
+ decoration = decoration->next;
+ continue;
+ }If a decoration matches the current branch why don't we just skip it like we used to? (As an aside the existing code in wrong because if the user runs "git rebase --update-refs <upstream> <branch>" HEAD does not point to "<branch>" but lets not worry about that now)
+ path = branch_checked_out(decoration->name);
As I said above if the symref target is anther branch we should skip it and if the target is not a branch then we need to check if the target is checked out so we need to resolve the ref before calling branch_checked_out(). Thanks Phillip