Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] http: add support for HTTP 429 rate limit retries
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2026-03-10 19:19:09
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 04:34:25PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:quoted
"Vaidas Pilkauskas via GitGitGadget" [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Changes since v4: * fix only strbuf_attach() calls which don't need reallocation * remove patch, which enforces strbuf_attach() contract via BUG() ... Vaidas Pilkauskas (4): strbuf: pass correct alloc to strbuf_attach() in strbuf_reencode() strbuf_attach: fix call sites to pass correct alloc remote-curl: introduce show_http_message_fatal() helperThese three patches looked quite reasonable to me.quoted
http: add support for HTTP 429 rate limit retriesI'd feel comfortable to see somebody more familiar with the HTTP transport code base to take a look at this step before we declare victory.Any volunteers?Sorry, I'm way underwater on things I could/should be reviewing, and this one was quite non-trivial. ;) I just left some comments. A lot of it was about how to more cleanly integrate with the http code (which I admit is a mess, especially with respect to which "layer" things should happen at). Some of that may be debatable, though I hope we can make things a bit cleaner. But I think there may be a logic error in how http_request_recoverable() loops, which certainly needs to be fixed.
Thanks.