Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2026-03-04

Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] list-objects-filter: use oidmap_clear_with_free() for cleanup

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2026-03-04 21:43:19

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Seyi Kuforiji [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Wed, 4 Mar 2026 at 16:31, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Agreed. But I think with the current status quo I'd rather drop this
patch though as it may otherwise make the reader scratch their head why
we do the exercise in the first place.
I do not think too strongly either way myself, but you may be right.

Unless we are dropping the "we optionally let you free the shell"
traditional interface, it is of questionable value to use the new
interface.

Thanks.
Hello

Thank you so much for the reviews.

I'll send a new version dropping the [PATCH 3/5].
I thought that Patrick wants to see only [1/5] and [2/5], discarding
the rest (i.e. 3/5, 4/5, and 5/5).  If that is the plan, I do not
think we need any resend.
Ah, in https://lore.kernel.org/git/aafX5CmP82WYFyIb@pks.im/ (local) he wants
the callback to be renamed, so we do need a new iteration (v3).  I
still think that if you are to drop [3/5], then [4/5] and [5/5]
should also be dropped, leaving only the first two patches.

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help