On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 09:21:16AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

The "--stdin-packs" option can be used to merge objects from multiple
packfiles given via stdin into a new packfile. One big upside of this
option is that we don't have to perform a complete rev walk to enumerate
objects. Instead, we can simply enumerate all objects that are part of
the specified packfiles, which can be significantly faster in very large
repositories.

There is one downside though: when we don't perform a rev walk we also
don't have a good way to learn about the respective object's names. As a
consequence, we cannot use the name hashes as a heuristic to get better
delta selection.

We try to offset this downside though by performing a localized rev
walk: we queue all objects that we're about to repack as interesting,
and all objects from excluded packfiles as uninteresting. We then
perform a best-effort rev walk that allows us to fill in object names.

There is one gotcha here though: when "--exclude-promisor-objects" has
not been given we will perform backfill fetches for any promised objects
that are missing. This used to not be an issue though as this option was
mutually exclusive with "--stdin-packs". But that has changed recently,
and starting with dcc9c7ef47 (builtin/repack: handle promisor packs with
geometric repacking, 2026-01-05) we will now repack promisor packs
during geometric compaction. The consequence is that a geometric repack
may now perform a bunch of backfill fetches.

We of course cannot passe "--exclude-promisor-objects" to fix this
issue -- after all, the whole intent is to repack objects part of a
promisor pack. But arguably we don't have to: the rev walk is intended
as best effort, and we already configure it to ignore missing links to
other objects. So we can adapt the walk to unconditionally disable
fetching any missing objects.

"passe" -> "pass".

Oops, right. Fixed locally, and I saw that you also fixed it in your
version.

Other than that, very nicely described, and the implementation is
surprisingly simple (thanks to a single global variable, and
asumption that makes it safe to use such a single global variable,
i.e., there is just one packing operation running at a time).

Will queue.  Thanks.

Thanks!

Patrick