Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

Phillip Wood [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

From: Phillip Wood <redacted>

This series has a couple of cleanups on top of 'en/xdiff-cleanup-2'
that reduce the sizes of the xrecord_t and xdlclass_t. Unfortunately
they conflict with 'en/xdiff-cleanup-3' in seen, in particular with
db8a50ca6b9 (xdiff: don't waste time guessing the number of lines,
2026-01-02). I'm not particularly convinced that moving the call to
xdl_classify_record() out of xdl_prepare_ctx() in that commit is
a good idea, but if we decide that we do want to stop classifying
lines in xdl_prepare_ctx() we can start passing the hashes out in a
separate array rather than wasting space in xrecord_t.

Both patches look well reasoned and sensible.

I was hoping that these two patches will get reviewed by somebody
else in adddition to mine, but unfortunately nothing happened.  I am
inclined to merge it down so that the other topic can have a stable
base to be rebased.

Opinions?