Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] Introduce git-history(1) command for easy history editing

Phillip Wood [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Granted, I think good progress is being made and perhaps the changes
needed for the rest aren't that huge (and maybe there's more pieces
I'm not quite understanding yet similar to the
two-split-patches-always-summing-to-the-original), I was just a little
surprised that my comments are summarized by "expecting a small and
final reroll".  :-)

It was because I didn't think (and I still do not think) your
comments are something for the immediate future, for a tool that
wants to present its minimum-serviceable experimental version to
users so that the users can experiment, extend it more and fix its
behaviour incrementally.  I may have been probably wrong, but I was
getting an impression from the reviews that it is getting to there,
not the feature-perfect version that needs only maintenance from now
on, but a minimum-serviceable one.

We could instead of collect all the I want moon and I want cheeze
comments and iterate until the tool has all of them before it hits
'next', but I do not think it is often what we do to a new feature.

Yes I'm not expecting any new functionality but I am expecting a bit 
more than tiny cleanup.

OK.  Then we'd need a non-trivial amount of work before we get
there.

Thanks.