Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] reftable: ensure tables in a stack use sequential update indices

Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Wouldn't 'monotonically increasing' suggest that
prev_table.max_update_index can be equal to cur_table.min_update_index?
I have locally changed it to 'ascending order' for similar reasons.

I guess the correct phrase here is "strictly monotonically increasing".

Both of you are right and I was wrong.  Thanks for a clarification.