Re: [PATCH 3/4] t5510: prefer "git -C" to subshell for followRemoteHEAD tests

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Unfortunately I tend to agree.  A few downsides I find a bit
problematic in the subshell solution are
[...]

OK, I am happy to drop that patch (3/4). The resulting change to the
final patch to match style would be:
...
But both patches are already in 'next'. How do you want to proceed? I
can prepare a patch on top converting back to sub-shells. Or if we are
going to do the post-release rewind of next, that is an opportunity to
fix things cleanly. Or we could leave it as-is if it is not worth the
bother at this point.

The last one ;-).  This is the kind of preference that falls into
"once the code is written in one way, it is not worth the patch
noise to rewrite it in the other way" category.