Re: [RFC] Allow includeIf.hasconfig to take precedence over includeIf.gitdir

"engdoc" [off-list ref] writes:

[administrivia: please wrap overly long lines]

Background:

Currently, when both includeIf.gitdir and includeIf.hasconfig
conditions match for a repository, Git always processes gitdir
first, regardless of the order in the config file.

Is that true?  I created an empty repository in /var/tmp/x/includeIf
and added this in its .git/config file:

        [core]
                repositoryformatversion = 0
                filemode = true
                bare = false
                logallrefupdates = true

        [includeIf "hasconfig:remote.*.url:*"]
                path = /var/tmp/x/includeIf/.git/hasRemote

        [includeIf "gitdir:/var/tmp/x/includeIf/.git"]
                path = /var/tmp/x/includeIf/.git/Here

        [remote "this"]
                url = .

where hasRemote and Here each have a single line

	[jch] included = hasRemote  # in hasRemote
	[jch] included = Here       # in Here

With that preparation done, I tried

    $ git config list --local --includes
    core.repositoryformatversion=0
    core.filemode=true
    core.bare=false
    core.logallrefupdates=true
    includeif.hasconfig:remote.*.url:*.path=/var/tmp/x/includeIf/.git/hasRemote
    jch.included=hasRemote
    includeif.gitdir:/var/tmp/x/includeIf/.git.path=/var/tmp/x/includeIf/.git/Here
    jch.included=Here
    remote.this.url=.

Notice that the multi-valued configuration variable jch.included
gets hasRemote first and then Here second.

Then I swapped the two includeIf in the .git/config file and ran the
experiment again.

    $ git config list --local --includes
    core.repositoryformatversion=0
    core.filemode=true
    core.bare=false
    core.logallrefupdates=true
    includeif.gitdir:/var/tmp/x/includeIf/.git.path=/var/tmp/x/includeIf/.git/Here
    jch.included=Here
    includeif.hasconfig:remote.*.url:*.path=/var/tmp/x/includeIf/.git/hasRemote
    jch.included=hasRemote
    remote.this.url=.

I do not doubt that you are having some problem, but it does not
look to me that your description above points to the source of the
problem.