Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2025, #01; Sun, 3)

Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref] writes:

So with that knowledge I'd rather do the safe thing and abort the
transaction. It requires less hard-to-test logic and feels safer
overall.

If we agree on that I can send a final reroll that reverts back to the
logic we had in v3, which did abort the transaction.

I guess both you and Peff also prefer code that is more maintainable
and easier to reason about, and I am with you two, so let's go back
to the approach of v3.

Thanks.