Andreas Schwab [off-list ref] writes:
On Jul 11 2025, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
I think that is correct; I do not think gpg.program is to give a
path to the program, so comparison with core.excludesfile is
probably not so appropriate.
It gives a command line, e.g. "mysign --compat=gnupg",
gpg-interface does not use the shell to run gpg.program, so this won't
work.
You're right. Thanks for correcting me.
I should have gone to the code I wrote instead of answering from
what I didn't see (namely, the word "pathname") in the
documentation X-<.