Ramsay Jones [off-list ref] writes:
Of course, practically zero is not zero, so we could do this in a
follow-up patch if we wanted to take a more conservative approach.
(Carlos has a series in progress which would conflict with such a
patch - but the conflict resolution would be simple).
...
Let me know if you would like that follow-up patch.
Nah, I think good enough is good enough. Not worth spending more
braincycles on it. Unless you absolutely do not have anything
better to do, that is ;-)
If somebody really finds the "practically zero" solution disturbing,
they can do a follow-up after the dust settles, of course.