Re: [PATCH] revision: fix --left/right-only use with unrelated histories
From: Matt Hunter <hidden>
Date: 2025-03-30 10:54:09
On Sun Mar 30, 2025 at 6:11 AM EDT, Phillip Wood wrote:
Thank you for adding a test. We have a helper function test_line_count which provides a helpful debugging message if the comparison fails. Using that and avoiding process substitutions we'd write sort head >sorted_head && sort cmp >sorted_cmp && comm -12 sorted_head sorted_cmp >actual && test_line_count = 0 actual
Thanks for that helper tip. I was just about to send a v2 when your
message came in, so I'm getting that incorporated now.
By the way, I had originally wanted to write test assertions that
checked the actual number of commit ids returned from each of the two
calls to rev-list - something like:
git rev-list --X-only HEAD...cmp >file &&
test_line_count = N file
But since I'm not very familiar with this test harness yet, I couldn't
actually figure the correct value for N. It's not 1 (the commit made in
my test body), and it's not 2 (that commit, plus the one from the setup
case at the top of the file). Any appropriate higher value wasn't
obvious.
So I switched to what you saw in my v1. Maybe this "no commit ids in
common" test is actually the stronger assertion?