Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, 2025-04-04

Re: [PATCH] revision: fix --left/right-only use with unrelated histories

From: Matt Hunter <hidden>
Date: 2025-03-30 10:54:09

On Sun Mar 30, 2025 at 6:11 AM EDT, Phillip Wood wrote:
Thank you for adding a test. We have a helper function test_line_count 
which provides a helpful debugging message if the comparison fails. 
Using that and avoiding process substitutions we'd write

	sort head >sorted_head &&
	sort cmp >sorted_cmp &&
	comm -12 sorted_head sorted_cmp >actual &&
	test_line_count = 0 actual
Thanks for that helper tip.  I was just about to send a v2 when your
message came in, so I'm getting that incorporated now.

By the way, I had originally wanted to write test assertions that
checked the actual number of commit ids returned from each of the two
calls to rev-list - something like:

    git rev-list --X-only HEAD...cmp >file &&
    test_line_count = N file

But since I'm not very familiar with this test harness yet, I couldn't
actually figure the correct value for N.  It's not 1 (the commit made in
my test body), and it's not 2 (that commit, plus the one from the setup
case at the top of the file).  Any appropriate higher value wasn't
obvious.

So I switched to what you saw in my v1.  Maybe this "no commit ids in
common" test is actually the stronger assertion?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help