Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 2 authors, 2025-04-29

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] read-cache: check range before dereferencing an array element

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2025-03-28 05:49:55

On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 11:05:57AM +0000, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
From: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>

Before accessing an array element at a given index, we should make sure
that the index is within the desired bounds, otherwise it makes little
sense to access the array element in the first place.

In this instance, testing whether `ce->name[common]` is the trailing NUL
byte is technically different from testing whether `common` is within
the bounds of `previous_name`. It is also redundant, as the range-check
guarantees that `previous_name->buf[common]` cannot be NUL and therefore
the condition `ce->name[common] == previous_name->buf[common]` would not
be met if `ce->name[common]` evaluated to NUL.

However, in the interest of reducing the cognitive load to reason about
the correctness of this loop (so that I can focus on interesting
projects again), I'll simply move the range-check to the beginning of
the loop condition and keep the redundant NUL check.
Thanks, I think this explanation works, and the patch looks fine. (I
didn't dig deeply into patch 1, but I agree with Junio's analysis that
it is also a false positive).

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help