Hi Junio,

On Tue, 25 Mar 2025, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

I have stated my preferences previously, even attempted to coordinate
between Git and Git for Windows, and I observe that the way I present
arguments is ineffective. Therefore I will try something new: Refer you to
a couple of resources that could elicit some introspection and
(re-)thinking of existing practices:

It is even less effective.  Friday may be bad and many people may
agree to avoid Friday releases.

Thank you for your honesty. I want to share that I have spent considerable
time reflecting on the release process because I genuinely care about
improving it both for the sake of Git's users as well as its contributors.
I've thoughtfully weighed the challenges -- like having clear and
dependable timelines, like timing releases around holidays, weekends, and
accommodating embargoed releases -- and observe significant room for
improvement.

I approached writing the email to which you replied with the intention of
fostering a collaborative discussion. I put a lot of effort into crafting
my thoughts constructively, writing and rewriting the email, even deleting
several well-laid out arguments in the interest of a less confrontational
and dismissive tone in favor of inspiring reflection, and I had hoped for
a response that mirrored that level of consideration.

That said, I am eager to hear your thoughts on how we can shift this
dialogue into a more productive and collaborative direction, one where we
focus on enhancing the project together.

So what is your preference?

Apart from seeing the need to improve on the status quo, I have no fixed
preference. How do _you_ envision a release process that could better
serve the needs of everyone involved?

Looking forward to hearing your insights,
Johannes

In any case, I'll go back to my vacation ;-)

I hope it was a good, relaxing one, that helped you un- and rewind.