Re: [PATCH] t8002-blame: simplify padding generation in blank boundary tests

Jan Palus [off-list ref] writes:

Note that original version was "%0.s" in which there is some ambiguity
whether "0" is a flag or field width and not "%.0s" in which "0" indeed
would mean precision.

Ah, I missed that part.  Also thanks for filling in the "printf from
coreutils is the one that has issues with the code".

quoted

Anybody can help that "further polishing as suggested" step, and
when the patch is left in limbo for too long, I might step in to do
it myself (when I have no other better things to do), but it is
customary around here that the original patch submitter does so.

I was about to follow-up but didn't find time. Sorry it took so long.
I will post v2 shortly.

Thanks.